Comparison · Guide · Updated 13 September 2026

AI medical chronology software vs human chronology services in the UK (2026)

There are two ways to get a medical chronology for a personal-injury or clinical-negligence file in England and Wales: upload the records to software and get the chronology back in minutes, or send them to a company whose analysts or nurses write it for you over days or weeks. This page puts Med-Legal (software) next to ChronoLaw (software, subscription) and the UK's human providers — Clinco, MedBrief, UKExpertMedical, Sancus Solutions and Kingsbury Pagination — on price, turnaround, who produces the chronology and whether you can check it. Every competitor figure is from that provider's own page, checked on 13 September 2026 and linked.

Why start with Med-Legal

  • It is software, and it is self-serve. You upload the records, the platform reads every page and generates the documents. No instruction letter, no quote, no waiting for an analyst to pick up the file. Most files come back in minutes; very large scanned sets in under an hour.
  • Every fact is checked before you see it. Each entry in the chronology carries the document and page it came from, and the quoted text is matched in code against that page. On real files around 99% of citations verify. A human-written chronology gives you the analyst's word; this gives you the page.
  • You pay per document, not per month and not per page. £25 for a chronology and summary at the single-unit price, down to £8 at volume; a full paginated bundle is four units. No subscription. The first ten documents are free (up to two a day on a free account, no card needed).
  • You get the court-ready set: a Chronology & Medical Summary (Word), a verified Fact Ledger, and an indexed, paginated, hyperlinked bundle (PDF).
  • It is honest about its limits. The output is an AI-assisted draft for a fee-earner or expert to review against the cited pages. It does not obtain records for you, and it does not give a medical opinion.
Start free — 10 documents, no card →

Software or service? The comparison

ProviderWhat you getWho produces itPriceTurnaroundCan you check it?
Software · AI + verified
Med-Legal
med-legal.co.uk
Chronology & medical summary (Word), verified fact ledger, indexed and paginated bundle (PDF). Self-serve upload. Software. AI extraction, then every fact is verified in code against its source page and quote; a review gate before use. £25 per document, down to £8 at volume. Bundle = 4 units. No subscription. First 10 documents free. Minutes for most files; under an hour for very large scanned sets. Yes — every entry cites its page and the quote is machine-checked. Around 99% verified on real files.
Software · AI
ChronoLaw
chronolaw.co.uk/pricing
Case chronology with confidence scores, court bundle generation, case chat. Self-serve upload. Software. AI extraction with confidence scoring; "flags low-confidence entries for your review". Monthly subscription: £299/month (4,000 pages, 3 users), £599/month (12,000 pages, 10 users), £999/month (26,000 pages, 50 users). Pay-per-page "on request". 14-day free trial. "Days to minutes" per the site; no figure published. Entries cite document and page; confidence score per entry. Verification method not described.
Human service
Clinco (Clinical Collation Ltd)
clinco.co.uk
Chronology, pagination, indexing, records review. "Trained and experienced analysts familiar with NHS and private medical records." Not published — "request a cost estimate". Not published. Analyst-written narrative; no page-level verification described.
Human service
MedBrief (MedBrief Services Ltd)
medbrief.com
Chronology, collation, pagination, early case assessment, delivered through a web viewing platform. "Our expert team constructs" the chronology — human-produced. Not published. Not published. Human narrative; no page-level verification described. States ISO 27001, ISO 9001 and Cyber Essentials Plus.
Human service
UKExpertMedical
ukexpertmedical.co.uk
Chronology ("essential entries as they are written"), pagination, collation, indexing. "Midwives, nurses and legal personnel" — "over 150 years of combined clinical experience". Not published. Pagination "within 21 days from receipt of the instruction"; chronology: no figure. Clinician-written; no page-level verification described.
Human service
Sancus Solutions
sancussolutions.co.uk
"A complete chronology" / detailed timeline of the patient's medical history. A single "in-house analyst" researches and reviews the history. Core business is investigation training. Not published. Not published. Analyst-written; no page-level verification described.
Human service
Kingsbury Pagination
kingsburypagination.co.uk
Bundle organisation, chronology, summarising memorandum, searchable indexed eBundle (PDF). Not stated on the site. "Fixed fee" — no figures published. Not published. States 30+ firms and 1,000+ files in 12 months. Human narrative; no page-level verification described.

Competitor figures are from each provider's own page as linked, retrieved 13 September 2026. "Not published" means the site did not state it on that date. Trademarks belong to their owners; none of the providers listed has endorsed this page. If a figure is out of date, tell us at info@med-legal.co.uk and we will correct it.

A worked example: one 1,500-page clinical-negligence file

  • Med-Legal: one document unit for the chronology and summary — £25 at the single-unit price, £8 at volume, or free if it is one of your first ten. Add the paginated bundle for four units. Back in well under an hour, every fact cited to its page.
  • ChronoLaw: the file fits the 4,000-page Starter allowance, so the cost is the £299 monthly subscription — the same whether you run one file that month or ten.
  • Human providers: a quote after they have seen the file, then days to weeks of turnaround; the one published figure is UKExpertMedical's 21 days for pagination.

Subscriptions suit a firm that runs a steady volume every month. Quotes suit a firm that wants someone else to take the file away. Per-document pricing suits everyone in between — one file this week, none next week, no contract either way — which is most small and mid-sized practices, and every medico-legal expert working case by case.

Where a human service is genuinely the better choice

  • You want a clinician's judgement written into the narrative. UKExpertMedical's midwives and nurses, or Sancus's investigators, bring human pattern-recognition to ambiguous or badly scanned notes. Med-Legal reports what the records say and flags what it could not read; it does not interpret.
  • You need the records obtained for you. Med-Legal works on records you already hold.
  • Your firm requires supplier certifications on paper. MedBrief states ISO 27001, ISO 9001 and Cyber Essentials Plus; Clinco states Cyber Essentials. Med-Legal does not currently hold those certificates. What it does: processes records on servers in the European Union under UK GDPR, deletes original uploads shortly after processing, and publishes its data handling at /security.

Where software wins

  • Speed: minutes, not a slot in someone's queue.
  • Checkability: a page reference on every line, machine-verified, so a fee-earner or expert can defend the chronology rather than take it on trust.
  • Price and commitment: a published price per document, no quote, no subscription, no minimum.
  • Volume: a 1,500-page set and a 40-page set take the same effort from you: upload and wait.

Questions people ask

Is Med-Legal software or a service where people write the chronology?

Software. You upload the records and the platform generates the documents. Nobody at Med-Legal reads your records or writes the chronology. It is unrelated to the earlier human-analyst business that used the med-legal.co.uk domain before 2026; that company's pages have been retired.

Which is cheaper, AI software or a human provider?

For a single file, per-document software: £25 (or free) against a monthly subscription from £299 or a per-case quote. For a firm running thousands of pages every month, compare a volume pack (£8 a document) with a subscription's page allowance; both are published, so the sum is easy.

How accurate is an AI chronology?

Med-Legal's answer is not a percentage claim about medicine; it is a checkable trail. Every fact cites its page and the quote is verified in code, and about 99% of citations verify on real files. What it cannot verify, it withholds and flags. It remains a draft for professional review.

Can I try it on a real file first?

Yes. The first ten documents are free, no card, up to two a day on a free account. Use a messy one: scans, handwriting, several providers out of order. Then open the citations.

Start free — 10 documents, no card →

See also: AI chronology platforms compared on free trials and pricing · Frequently asked questions.

General information for legal professionals, not legal advice. Competitors' prices and terms belong to the providers named and change without notice; the linked page is authoritative.